Saturday, January 4, 2020
A Critique of Cloud and Townsend - 1359 Words
A Critique of Cloud and Townsend A Critique of: Boundaries in Marriage by Dr. Henry Cloud and Dr. John Townsend In their book, Boundaries in Marriage, the authors, Cloud and Townsend, present a theoretical model for maintaining healthy relationships, specifically marriage relationships. This examination of Cloud and Townsendââ¬â¢s approach to maintaining healthy relationships summarizes both the theoretical and theological orientation of their proposed model, compares their approach to the model proposed by Sandra Wilson in her book, Hurt people hurt people, and considers the model in the context of Dr. Hawkins concentric circle theory of personality, and parents a critique with regard to someââ¬â¢ of the perceived strengths andâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦They suggest that living in accordance with these laws will foster success while rebellion against the laws will produce consequences. The ten laws, ââ¬Å" 1) sowing and reaping, 2) responsibility, 3) power, 4) respect, 5) motivation, 6) evaluation, 7) proactively, 8) envy, 9) activity, 10) exposureâ⬠(Cloud amp; Townsend, 1999, p.p. 37-58) define Godly principles of relationships. Additionally, the authors assert that the values we hold have enormous implications for the establishment of boundaries, they state, ââ¬Å"your values make sure that certain bad things are not present in the marriage and that certain good things areâ⬠(Cloud amp; Townsend, 1999, p.107). As this is the case Cloud and Townsend (1999) identified six values that are promoted in scripture and that they believe produce great boundaries in marriage. Those values include, ââ¬Å"love of God, love of your spouse, honesty, faithfulness, compassion and forgiveness, and holinessâ⬠(Cloud amp; Townsend, 1999, p.112). A Critique of Cloud and Townsend Strengths of Cloud and Townsend In many ways Cloud and Townsendââ¬â¢s (1999) approach to developing and maintaining healthy relationships is comparable to the model of change proposed in Dr. Wilsonââ¬â¢s book Hurt people hurt people. Although Dr. Wilson (2001) takes a much etiological approach to addressingShow MoreRelatedTheory Critique: Cloud and Townsend1533 Words à |à 7 Pagesï » ¿ Theory Critique: Cloud and Townsend B. J. Liberty University Theory Critique: Cloud and Townsend Summary Dr. Cloud and Dr. Townsend (1999) have created a comprehensive work titled Boundaries in Marriage. In this book they have outlined what boundaries are and what can be done to create healthy boundaries within a marriage. First, letââ¬â¢s look at the definition of boundaries. Cloud Townsend (1999) define this as ââ¬Å"a property lineâ⬠(p. 17). In other words in a marriageRead MoreBoundaries in Marriage. - Theory Critique Essay1351 Words à |à 6 PagesTheory Critique: Cloud and Townsend ââ¬Æ' Theory Critique: Cloud and Townsend Sam and Diane have been married for a few years now and, everything was so perfect in the beginning. There was nothing but plenty of love and romance. Even still, Sam had become more and more demanding of his wife until at a certain point he began demanding robotic perfection of his spouse. It took a few years, but Diane became more and more fed up. She became more and more hypersensitive and hyper-vigilant to anythingRead MoreHow Blake s Relationship With His Faith2109 Words à |à 9 Pages To better explain Blakeââ¬â¢s relationship with his faith, it is safe to say, that his writings reflected his faith. Even in the lamb he talks of the creator. Later he writes, ââ¬Å" Think of a cloud, as being holy you cannot love it but think of a holy man within the cloud love springs up in our thought, for to think of holiness distinct from man is impossible to the affections. Thought alone can make monsters, but the affections cannotâ⬠(Green, p.123). This further explains that Blake felt God was loveRead MorePersonal Theory Paper3660 Words à |à 15 Pagesthe development of my personal theory on Christian Counseling. I use many scriptural references to support my beliefs and stress the importance of gaining wisdom and knowledge from the bible. It incorporates all of the presentations, readings, and critiques I did at Liberty Universityââ¬â¢s Theology and Spirituality in counseling course. I talk about how I integrate Psychology, Theology, and Spirituality into my Christian counseling and believe that they all have a lot to offer the Christian counselor.Read MoreThe Integration of Christianity and Psychology3666 Words à |à 15 Pagesyourself the truth. Minneapolis, MN: Bethany House Publishers. Cloud, H., Townsend, J. (1999). Boundaries in marriage. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. Crabb, L. J. (1986). Effective biblical counseling: A model for helping caring Christians become capable counselors. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. Hart, A. D. (2001). The anxiety cure. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson. Oââ¬â¢Hare, C. (1991). The Basics of Counseling Theories and How to Critique a Counseling Theory from a Christian Perspective [PowerPoint slides]Read More Some Notes Concerning Affections and the Sublime in the Work of Jonathan Edward4475 Words à |à 18 Pagesof God, and his justice of eternally disposing of men, according to his sovereign pleasure. But never could give an account, how, or by what means, I was thus convinced. (283) And later, And as I was walking there, and looked up on the sky and clouds; there came into my mind, a sweet sense of the glorious majesty and grace of God, that I know not how to express. (285) Both examples show Edwardsââ¬â¢s willingness to admit that he cannot know the source of Godââ¬â¢s majesty nor comprehend the natureRead MoreProject Mgmt296381 Words à |à 1186 PagesUniversityââ¬âFederal Way; and Oya Tukel, Cleveland State University. In the fifth edition we continue to commit to improving the text content and improving instruction of project management. We are grateful to those reviewers who provided helpful critiques and insights on the fourth edition, which helped us prepare this revision. The reviewers for the fifth edition include. Gregory Anderson, Weber State University; Dana Bachman, Colorado Christian University; Alan Cannon, University of Texas, Arlington;
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.